Net neutrality is the principle that companies providing access to the Internet cannot discriminate between customers. For instance, consumers get the exact same service from their homes as ExxonMobil, Wal-Mart, Microsoft, HBO, Disney, and Dreamworks. Telecom companies claim that they cannot build the advanced Internet of the future unless they are able to charge extra for premium access. Net Neutrality advocates argue that the Internet was originally developed and built with taxpayer monies and should be seen as a public utility and that it has become, in essence, the public square of the twenty-first century. A multi-tiered system of access would not only limit free speech but also limit important new technologies. What would have happened if YouTube, MySpace, and Flikr had had to pay for premium service? What about the blogosphere?
Links:
Video from Save the Internet Coalition
Commercial from the Cable and Telecommunications Association
Don't Regulate coalition that includes AT&T and BellSouth
Robert McChesney on COPE Bill working its way through Congress (on Democracy Now, May 8, 2006)
NetCompetition.org coalition that includes AT&T, BellSouth, and other cable and telecommunications firms


No comments:
Post a Comment